Articles | Volume 1, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-1-69-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-1-69-2019
Research article
 | 
05 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 05 Dec 2019

Exploring the advantages and limitations of in situ U–Pb carbonate geochronology using speleothems

Jon Woodhead and Joseph Petrus

Related authors

A regolith lead isoscape of Australia
Candan U. Desem, Patrice de Caritat, Jon Woodhead, Roland Maas, and Graham Carr
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1383–1393, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1383-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1383-2024, 2024
Short summary
DQPB: software for calculating disequilibrium U–Pb ages
Timothy Pollard, Jon Woodhead, John Hellstrom, John Engel, Roger Powell, and Russell Drysdale
Geochronology, 5, 181–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-181-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-181-2023, 2023
Short summary
Robust isochron calculation
Roger Powell, Eleanor C. R. Green, Estephany Marillo Sialer, and Jon Woodhead
Geochronology, 2, 325–342, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-325-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2-325-2020, 2020
Short summary
The 4.2 ka event in the central Mediterranean: new data from a Corchia speleothem (Apuan Alps, central Italy)
Ilaria Isola, Giovanni Zanchetta, Russell N. Drysdale, Eleonora Regattieri, Monica Bini, Petra Bajo, John C. Hellstrom, Ilaria Baneschi, Piero Lionello, Jon Woodhead, and Alan Greig
Clim. Past, 15, 135–151, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-135-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-135-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Geochronological data analysis/statistics/modelling
Modeling apparent Pb loss in zircon U–Pb geochronology
Glenn R. Sharman and Matthew A. Malkowski
Geochronology, 6, 37–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-37-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-37-2024, 2024
Short summary
Calibration methods for laser ablation Rb–Sr geochronology: comparisons and recommendation based on NIST glass and natural reference materials
Stijn Glorie, Sarah E. Gilbert, Martin Hand, and Jarred C. Lloyd
Geochronology, 6, 21–36, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-6-21-2024, 2024
Short summary
Increased accuracy and precision in igneous and detrital zircon geochronology using CA-LA-ICPMS
Erin Elizabeth Donaghy, Michael P. Eddy, Federico Moreno, and Mauricio Ibañez-Mejia
Geochronology Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2023-20,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2023-20, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GChron
Short summary
Short communication: The Wasserstein distance as a dissimilarity metric for comparing detrital age spectra and other geological distributions
Alex Lipp and Pieter Vermeesch
Geochronology, 5, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-263-2023, 2023
Short summary
ChronoLorica: introduction of a soil–landscape evolution model combined with geochronometers
W. Marijn van der Meij, Arnaud J. A. M. Temme, Steven A. Binnie, and Tony Reimann
Geochronology, 5, 241–261, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-241-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-241-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Chew, D. M., Petrus, J. A., and Kamber, B. S.: U–Pb LA–ICPMS dating using accessory mineral standards with variable common Pb, Chem. Geol., 363, 185–199, 2014. 
Coogan, L. A., Parrish, R. R., and Roberts, N. M. W.: Early hydrothermal carbon uptake by the upper oceanic crust: insight from in situ U-Pb dating, Geology, 44, 147–150, 2016. 
Drost, K., Chew, D., Petrus, J. A., Scholze, F., Woodhead, J. D., Schneider, J. W., and Harper, D. A. T.: An Image Mapping Approach to U-Pb LA-ICP-MS Carbonate Dating and Applications to Direct Dating of Carbonate Sedimentation. Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 19, 4631–4648, 2018. 
Goodfellow, B. W., Viola, G., Bingen, B., Nuriel, P., and Kylander-Clark, A. R. C.: Palaeocene faulting in SE Sweden from U-Pb dating of slickenfibre calcite, Terra Nova, 29, 321–328, 2017. 
Hansman, R. J., Albert, R., Gerdes, A., and Ring, U.: Absolute ages of multiple generations of brittle structures by U-Pb dating of calcite, Geology, 46, 207–210, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Recently developed methods for in situ U–Pb age determination in carbonates have found widespread application, but the benefits and limitations of the method over bulk analysis approaches have yet to be fully explored. Here we use speleothems – cave carbonates such as stalagmites and flowstones – to investigate the utility of these in situ dating methodologies for challenging matrices with low U and Pb contents and predominantly late Cenozoic ages.